Condition Improvement Fund (CIF)

The Condition Improvement Fund (CIF) is an annual bidding round for eligible academies, sixth-form colleges and VA schools to apply for capital funding.

  • The priority of the fund is to support condition projects, especially those that relate to compliance and health and safety issues.
  • A small proportion of expansion projects are also supported in cases where the eligible body is rated good or outstanding by Ofsted and can demonstrate a need to expand.

Most CIF funding aims to address building issues with significant consequences that revenue or Devolved Formula Capital (DFC) funding cannot meet. These include issues with poor building condition, building compliance, energy efficiency or health and safety.

Email Us Today
or call 01253 376376

There are 3 categories of CIF project: condition, condition with expansion, and expansion.

Condition Projects

  • These are projects to improve the condition of buildings, with no expansion of the gross internal floor area (GIFA).

Condition with Expansion Projects

  • These are projects to improve the condition where the GIFA of the new block is up to 10% larger than the previous block. The aim of the project must primarily be to address significant condition need.

Expansion Projects

  • Expansion projects create additional places or address overcrowding. Applicants looking to expand must demonstrate that they are high performing and the GIFA of the new block must be more than 10% larger than the previous block or add functional areas or facilities.

To be eligible for CIF you must have been by 1st September 2021 either a:

  • Stand-alone academy
  • Multi-academy trust (MAT) with less than 5 academies or fewer than 3000 pupils
  • Sixth form college
  • Eligible voluntary-aided school
  • School with a signed academy order as of 1st September 2021 that the department expects will convert by 1st April 2022

Condition Data:

  • Applicants will need to provide appropriate building condition survey data or extracts to show proof of project need. An up to date independent condition survey will assist applicants in identifying and prioritising the worst condition areas of their site.

Condition Data:
Both with and without the proposed project:

  • Gross internal floor area (GIFA) of the whole school (m2) and how this relates to the recommended area contained within Building Bulletin 103 (BB103) or 104 as appropriate. Make sure you explain any significant differences in the application.
  • Number of pupils on roll (NOR), as applicable for the age range of the education establishment. You should complete the table on existing and forecast capacity and refer in your application to the change in the net capacity because of the proposed project by confirming the number of additional places that will be created by the project over and above the number(s) in your (current) funding agreement.

SPM can provide the data you need to support your CIF bid.

  • Evidence of condition from an independent source
  • Full school capacity report demonstrating a need to expand with comparisons to BB103
  • Up to date Net Capacity Assessment for the whole institution

POST-16 CAPACITY FUND

SPM can provide the data you need to support the Project Need section of your application.

  • Evidence of pupil capacity from an independent source
  • Scenario modelling for increasing capacity of the exiting site versus expansion
  • Up to date Net Capacity Assessment for the whole institution

Get the data you need with School Property Matters

Email Us Today
or call 01253 376376

The Post-16 Capacity Fund has been introduced as part of capital investment in the education estate announced at the 2020 Spending review.

The core objectives of the fund are:

  • To provide additional capacity in 16-19 providers where there is due to be a demographic increase in learners and there is not enough existing capacity to accommodate this increase.
  • To ensure that provision delivered through the additional space developed meets local and national skills requirements and is reflective of learner demand.
  • To do this in the most efficient and sustainable way possible, to ensure value for money for Government investment, and to support the target set by Government for the UK to bring all greenhouse gas emissions to net-zero by 2050.

Funding is available to support projects that will create additional space to accommodate increased 16-19 learner numbers.

Applicants looking to expand must be able to demonstrate that their project will either:

  • Increase the overall internal floor area (GIFA) of learning space and associated functional areas or facilities; or
  • Will reconfigure the estate within the existing GIFA in order to accommodate more learners.

To be eligible to apply for the fund, the institution for which funding is required must be:

  • An FE College established as a further education corporation under the Further and Higher Education Act 1992 (FHEA 1992)
  • A designated institution as per section 28 of FHEA 1992
  • A Sixth Form College as defined by section 91(3) FHEA 1992
  • An academy established as per section 1A(1)(a) Academies Act 2010 including and limited to:
    • 16-19 only Academies / Free Schools
    • University Technical Colleges (UTCs)
    • Studio Schools providing technical education
    • Maths Schools

Applications for the Post-16 Capacity Fund require supporting evidence for each of the following: Project Need, Project Planning and Project Cost.

Project Need:

  • Applicants need to include historic, existing and projected future annual data for 16-19 demographic growth and student demand for the institution in the application.
  • Data for the following, both with and without the proposed project:
    • Gross internal floor area (GIFA) of the whole provider (m2) and how this relates to the recommended area or estimates of required space per learner
    • Number of 16-18 learners/pupils on roll (NOR)
  • If applying for funding to increase the GIFA of the estate, the applicant should confirm that there are no alternative approaches.
  • Applicants should refer to the change in the net capacity because of the proposed project by confirming the number of additional places that are created by the project over and above current learner numbers.

How do I ensure strategic estate management within my school or trust? The crucial step you may be missing!

With the conversation around strategic estate management being so prominent in the education sector over recent years, little is being discussed about how to truly secure a strategically managed school estate. Establishing a ‘data driven’ estate function within your school or trust is the only way to ensure an estate that is strategically and effectively managed.

The perceived priorities of works to be done within the estate will vary depending on the position each stakeholder looks at the estate from. Teachers may only be concerned with the issues in their classrooms, therefore believing they should be top of the list. Alternatively, Headteachers may believe the need for new or improved teaching facilities is paramount. As an estate manager, you need the ability to remain objective when confronted with these differing viewpoints and demands, to truly set the priority list for capital expenditure from an unbiased perspective. Having a complete set of data, including floor plans, capacity data and condition reports for your site will enable you to make these decisions with confidence, demonstrating to each stakeholder where their priorities lie in the bigger strategic picture. 

The need for data only increases with the number of schools within your trust. Each school will ask and fight for their site to be the focus of your capital funding allocation. Arming your estate function with data will enable them to disarm lower priority demand, decisions made will be objective and allow for greater transparency of the decision-making process. For example, if you were to have 5 schools within your trust the only way to ensure fair and equitable allocation of funds such as School Condition Allocations is to have an informed capital programme detailing how the capital works fit in with the ongoing building maintenance. 

If your trust is taking on new schools, doing the necessary technical due diligence by sourcing preliminary data for the new sites prior to the schools joining your trust is essential. The maintenance, capital programme and pupil capacity of the sites will become your responsibility, so any residual estate issues need to be highlighted and a dowry negotiated for taking on the responsibility of the buildings. This will enable you to plan for any significant expenditure that your new sites may require.   

When speaking about this topic, School Property Matters Managing Director Jeremy Pilgrim summarised the importance of having a data driven estate function by posing the question ‘How can you manage it if you don’t measure it?’. Establishing clear, independent base data as the basis for your estate strategy is critical to the smooth running of your estate function, a data driven estate function is in complete control of the facts surrounding the estate and as a result, is able to make fully informed, equitable decisions in all areas. 

Who looks after capacity planning in your School or Trust?

With billions invested in providing extra pupil places over the past ten years, pupil capacity planning has very much been in focus nationally. 

However, at an individual school level the science of pupil capacity planning is poorly applied, resulting in a wide range of problems from over-crowding, poor space utilisation, escalating maintenance costs and unnecessary capital expenditure.

Speaking at Managing the School Estate Summit 2021 Jeremy Pilgrim of School Property Matters has 25 years’ experience, carrying out and analysing over 4000 surveys for 2500 schools as well as advising schools about the condition, capacity and utilisation of their buildings and facilities. 

With this background Jeremy believes that capacity planning is a crucial piece in the Estates Management jigsaw, even though current guidance on this area is limited in the DfE’s Good Estates Management Guide for Schools.

Jeremy asserts: “It is impossible to take a strategic approach to Estates Management without a clear picture and understanding of your school buildings’ capacity.”

While it is typically the headteacher who gets the call from the Local Authority about accommodating more pupils, they frequently do not have the right data or expertise to hand to provide a considered response about how their buildings need to expand.

“At the moment capacity planning falls between two stools but we want to encourage Senior Leadership Teams to think about their buildings and their school separately,” Jeremy explains. 

“The physical facilities are clearly the responsibility of the Estates team. Whereas the operational unit comprising teachers and pupils remains the headteacher’s domain to look after.”

Reflecting on some capacity planning disasters he has witnessed over his career Jeremy says: “I’ve seen schools raise hundreds of thousands of pounds of parents’ money for something they didn’t need, with personalities driving a capital programme.

“I’ve also seen a science specialist school resort to teaching A level science students in the school hall because they didn’t have enough labs – despite having three art rooms each the same size as a science lab.

“I know of one extremely cramped and overcrowded school that took many more pupils than their buildings could accommodate and disadvantaged itself in bids for expansion funding by achieving outstanding grades.

“And I’ve seen Local Authorities tempt headteachers with meagre expansion budgets when actually the work required was triple the cost.”

All of these problems, Jeremy believes, can be completely avoided by establishing a clear, factual baseline of capacity requirements, and making your Estates function the natural custodian of that information. 

“Headteachers don’t necessarily wish to appear hard-headed so it would suit them to delegate capacity planning to Estates,” Jeremy comments. 

“Armed with the data it is then the Estates function that can negotiate with the funding bodies and become a very useful ally for the Governors and Senior Leadership team.”

For further insight into the strategic importance of including capacity planning in the Estates function of your school or trust listen to Jeremy’s presentation at Managing the School Estate Summit 2021.

To arrange for a Pupil Capacity Report to be carried out at your site, contact info@schoolpropertymatters.co.uk

T LEVEL CAPITAL FUND (TLCF) – BUILDING AND FACILITIES IMPROVEMENT GRANT

SPM can provide the data you need to support your bid for funding.

  • Evidence of condition from an independent source
  • Space Needs Assessment as justification for expansion projects
  • Up to date Net Capacity Assessment for the whole institution

Be confident in your bid with School Property Matters

Email Us Today
or call 01253 376376

T Levels are new technical study programmes that will sit alongside apprenticeships. The DfE have put in place the T Level Capital Fund to help providers deliver the programmes as part of their curriculum.

The fund is formed of 2 parts:

  • The Buildings and Facilities Improvement Grant (BFIG) which providers will need to bid for
  • The Specialist Equipment Allocation (SEA) which will be awarded to providers using a formula allocation (provided they have not previously received funding for the particular route/s)

The first T Levels were launched in September 2020 with £38 million of capital funding available to ensure providers were prepared to run the programmes. This was followed by a further capital round of £95 million to prepare for delivery in 2021.

The T Level curriculum continues to expand with new providers coming on board to deliver these programmes.

There are two types of projects funded under BFIG, these are:

Estates improvement project – this is a project that will improve the condition of your estate.

  • This includes refurbishment and/ or a new build/ acquisition.
  • It must not increase the internal floor area.
  • You need to show there is no increase in internal floor area (as a result of demolition or disposal where you build the new space).

Estates improvement projects with expansion – this is a project that will increase your internal floor area and improve the condition of your estate.

  • You will need to show why you need the increase in space. This will need to be understood in the context of your existing estate and student/ pupil numbers
  • You must need the increase to address existing overcrowding issues. Projects will not be supported where your growth is the key goal and may not be funded if the need for additional space is not adequately justified.
  • Projects will be assessed on the same basis as estates improvement projects.

In order to apply for BFIG you must:

  • Be a provider on the list of ‘Providers selected to deliver the T Levels’
  • Be an academy, further education college, higher education institution, school, sixth form college or university technical college
  • Not have been previously awarded a BFIG for the T Level route for the institution or campus you are applying for.

Where an academy is part of a Multi Academy Trust (MAT) the MAT will need to apply on behalf of the academy. For each academy one application per academy per route should be submitted.

For college corporations with multiple campuses the corporation will need to apply on behalf of the college or campus.

Condition data:

For both Estates improvement projects and Estates improvement projects with expansion condition data must be collected. This must be in the form of an independently sourced condition survey from a third party. Condition Data Collection report is not sufficient to bid for this fund. Our condition surveys include all the necessary data needed including proper condition gradings and priority.

Capacity data:

When applying for an Estates improvement projects with expansion project, up-to-date capacity data must be included in your application. This includes a Net Capacity Assessment for the whole institution at the time of application and further evidence, such as curriculum analysis of all teaching showing what T Levels would replace and how this impacts on the total number and type of teaching spaces.

Our capacity reports provide all this data in one, easily accessible place.

Why 15 is NOT The Magic Number

Social Distancing in Schools – Calculating Pupil Numbers by Room Type

If schools are to maintain social distancing, they cannot run at full capacity, meaning they will have to find a way to adapt to this ‘new normal’.

School Property Matters is the country’s foremost specialist in calculating school pupil capacities; therefore, the best way in which we can support the sector at this time is to advise on the pupil capacity of a school when accommodating social distancing.

This document details the current Department for Education guidelines for implementing social distancing in schools, calculations for class sizes within primary and secondary schools, and other factors to consider when deciding how to operate schools at this time.


Covid-19 Statement

Last Updated: July 2021

School Property Matters is the country’s foremost specialist in calculating school pupil capacities and works with local authorities, academy trusts, and individual schools across the country. The company works within schools to measure and assess the sites and buildings and then completes detailed analysis as a desk based exercise.

As a result of the changes to restrictions put in place in England from the 19th July, we are starting to welcome staff back into our office. We will be working to a rota system to keep the numbers reduced in the short term. With regards to site visits we will continue to operate following covid secure procedures as outlined below.

The following procedures are designed with the health and safety of employees and clients in mind and cover three areas; covid testing, travel and accommodation, and site procedures.

Covid Testing

We have implemented regular rapid testing for all staff required to visit school sites. We will also ensure that staff test negative before travelling to any on site appointments. 

Travel and Accommodation

As the company operates nationally, under normal circumstances staff will stay in hotels local to the customer’s schools when required. At present, hotels across the country are open and taking bookings. Therefore at present we are able to work in any area, although we are are avoiding the use of hotels and unnecessary travel where possible.

When traveling to on site appointments, School Property Matters employees will travel separately to the location and will avoid the use of public transport where possible.

Site Procedures

Whilst on school sites, the team will visit each space and take required dimensions. Taking the dimensions involves no contact with any building elements and thus is considered to be a low risk of transmission. The key issues are identified as; interaction with school staff where unavoidable, opening of doors, and use of sanitary facilities. 

Interaction with school staff: The site team will continue, where possible, to maintain distance when interacting with any school staff or pupils in the building. School Property Matters will only send necessary staff to work on site, numbers of staff will be kept as low as possible to help reduce transmission. Where possible, staff will follow individual school guidelines in place and will discuss this with the customer before visiting site. 

Wearing PPE: Staff will continue to wear masks provided by the company where distance cannot be maintained or when requested by the individual school.

Opening of doors: Gaining access to every space requires passing through doors where the handles are identified as a possible transmission risk. When arriving at site, the team will discuss 

with school staff how to mitigate this by potentially having every door be left open for them to gain entry. Where this is not possible, the team will have disinfectant wipes and hand sanitiser to sensibly reduce the risk of transmission to and from them on any door handle. Staff will also carry a door opening hook and will use this where possible.

Use of sanitary facilities: The team may need to use the toilet facilities at some stage during the visit, they will discuss with school staff what individual procedures are in place and agree which toilets they are permitted to use. The team will use disinfectant wipes to wipe the toilet, sink and door handles prior to and after use and will follow hand washing guidance. 

School Property Matters has taken a considered and sensible approach to continuing site work within schools and is committed to maintaining covid secure practices in the workplace. 

Schools Need Volvo City Safety

Volvo came up with an amazing system to constantly monitor the road and detect when you were about to hit something in front of you. The car applies the brakes and stops you before the accident happens. The system was not an optional extra, Volvo fitted it to all their cars as standard some years ago.

Like most men, I consider myself to be a good driver and thought that whilst a good innovation, the system wouldn’t make much difference to me. However, over the five years I drove that Volvo I think it saved me from about five minor accidents. As I hadn’t had five minor accidents in the five prior years, I couldn’t help wondering why that was and wondered if the system might be over eager.

On reflection, I now think the answer is complacency, the first time it deployed was nothing to do with my driving, it was a sudden change of mind by the driver in front. He decided the enormous gap he was pulling in to wasn’t enormous enough and suddenly stopped, I was busy checking that the gap was big enough for me too and was proceeding accordingly. The car wasn’t distracted, it was busy doing its job and saw the situation clearly and acted correctly and avoided an incident.

Within a month an identical situation occurred, yet again, Volvo saved the day. Now at this point I became aware of the system and started to chat to others about it and joked that I no longer needed to concentrate in traffic, as the car did it for me. I think the next few similar incidents happened because on some level I had started to do what I was joking about and let the car handle that part of our combined tasks, I think in business speak we call it delegation.

Fast forward to today, the Volvo moved to a new home five months ago and my new car doesn’t have a similar system. Volvo City Safety didn’t advertise itself to me on a daily basis, there was no light on the dashboard to remind me of its presence. It was just there and had proven its ability, so I relied on it implicitly, an unspoken trust. I’m probably more vulnerable to a small rear end accident now without it, but I’m not conscious of that on a daily basis and won’t be until an incident occurs.

What has this got to do with schools and why are you telling me this I hear you ask. Well I can’t help wondering about small schools which have been in the local authority system for their entire existence and rely on their procedures and support for things they aren’t always aware of, but have been in place for many years. When they move in to the new world of independence and MATs, do they know the MATs don’t yet have all these systems and safety nets in place, as they are still evolving and learning what their role is?